Monday, December 6, 2010

Rules "violations" highlight need for changes

I just read an interesting piece on Golf Channel’s website about the oddities of rules violations on the PGA tour this year. See http://www.thegolfchannel.com/tour-insider/poulters-blunder-latest-year-bizarre-rulings-40539/

Since my main career as a District Judge and lawyer involve interpretation of laws and rules, I feel compelled to comment.

There have been many times over the years when supposed rules violations have cost players victories or many thousands of dollars. The situation has gotten more and more attention as television covers a greater number of holes in an increasing number of tournaments.

Remember years ago when Raymond Floyd was penalized for “building a stance”? He had placed a towel on the ground to protect his knees and pants from the wet ground when he had to kneel to hit a shot. It was ridiculous. He was trying to keep his pants clean, not build a stance. He got no advantage from the towel.

Last week, Ian Poulter was penalized a shot when he dropped his ball on his ball marker, and it moved. It may have cost him more than $400,000. As reported on the Golf Channel web site, “Jeff Hall of the USGA points out, the marker is the equivalent of the ball. If Poulter’s ball had been on the green and moved ever so slightly, “I suspect most people wouldn’t have the emotional connection to a penalty,” Hall said.

“At the end of the day, our rules are clear,” Hall said. “Our game is unique from all others. It requires us to know the rules.”

Well, I disagree, Mr. Hall. Movement by Poulter’s ball on the green would only have resulted in a penalty if he had addressed it.

I also disagree with the penalty assessed to Dustin Johnson at the PGA, which cost him a chance at a playoff. The issue came down to whether he was in a clearly defined bunker. The officials said he was. I don’t think so.

I really think that the Rules of Golf need to be changed to account for plain violations which result in an advantage to a player and inadvertent ones which do not. I’d also like to see players be assigned a rules advocate. And yes, Mr. and Mrs. USGA, I’d be willing to volunteer.

No comments:

Post a Comment